Independent review of 36 news records

Record the article’s evidence before consulting previous classifications. The sample is fixed: retain inaccessible records and select “unresolved.” A relevant school-book story may concern a proposal, retention, restriction or reversal; topic relevance alone does not establish a ban.

This form sends nothing to a server. Export progress before closing the page; entries are not saved automatically. Import the exported JSON to continue. Keep the completed review local until it has been checked.

  1. Open the selected article and record the actual URL read. Related coverage may be noted separately but cannot establish identical article contents.
  2. Identify school versus public-library context. Classify only after reading usable content.
  3. Confirm a district with state and official NCES directory evidence. A publisher’s city and a same-name district are insufficient.
  4. Keep publication, challenge, restriction, vote and implementation dates separate. Leave event dates empty when unsupported.
  5. Explain the evidence and limits. Compare against the earlier review only after the independent pass.